Difference between revisions of "User:Dys2"

From PrattWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
 
(5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
NAE Grand Challenges in Engineering
+
March 04, 2009
Filed under:
+
Wrapping Up the NAE Grand Challenges Summit
 +
Engineering Dean's closing remarks summarize the conference
  
    * CRA Taulbee Survey
+
The National Academy of Engineering Grand Challenge Summit, a two-day event recently held at Duke University, brought together more than 900 leading engineering, science, humanities and social science scholars to articulate the challenges and opportunities of the science, technology, and policy related to each Grand Challenge and proposed solutions. The Grand Challenges are a call to action and serve as a focal point for society's attention to the most important opportunities that challenge our quality of life.
    * Grand Challenges
 
  
— Jay Vegso @ 4:37 pm
+
The summit's speakers featured an array of national engineering leaders and thinkers, including:
  
The National Academy of Engineering has released its list of 14 Grand Challenges for Engineering for the 21st century.
+
  * Charles Vest, NAE president
 +
  * Robert Socolow, Princeton University
 +
  * Robert Langer, MIT, recipient of the 2008 Millennium Technology Prize
 +
  * Tom Byers, Stanford University?
 +
  * Donald MacLean Kerr, principal deputy director, U.S. National Intelligence
 +
  * Jeff Hawkins, founder, Redwood Center for Theoretical Neuroscience
  
According to the report’s press release:
+
Closing remarks which summed up the event were delivered by Yannis C. Yortsos, Dean of Engineering at the University of Southern California.
  
    The final choices fall into four themes that are essential for humanity to flourish – sustainability, health, reducing vulnerability, and joy of living. The committee did not attempt to include every important challenge, nor did it endorse particular approaches to meeting those selected. Rather than focusing on predictions or gee-whiz gadgets, the goal was to identify what needs to be done to help people and the planet thrive.
+
At a rather unsuspecting time, a mere one year ago, the National Academy of Engineering articulated 14 engineering grand challenges. While financial clouds were still far in the horizon, these challenges were centered on important societal and human needs. Professor Socolow brilliantly categorized them yesterday:
  
The 14 challenges are:
+
Sustainability, Health, Vulnerability, The Joy of Living
  
  # Make solar energy affordable
+
When the clouds brought the global financial storm last Fall, these needs moved from a perhaps abstract subtext to the center of gravity of today's reality, one very real to everyone, everywhere.
  # Provide energy from fusion
 
  # Develop carbon sequestration methods
 
  # Manage the nitrogen cycle
 
  # Provide access to clean water
 
  # Restore and improve urban infrastructure
 
  # Advance health informatics
 
  # Engineer better medicines
 
  # Reverse-engineer the brain
 
  # Prevent nuclear terror
 
  # Secure cyberspace
 
  # Enhance virtual reality
 
  # Advance personalized learning
 
  # Engineer the tools for scientific discovery
 
  
Further information about the challenges can be found at: http://www.engineeringchallenges.org/
+
Engineering schools across the country warmly embraced the NAE grand challenges. This first Grand Challenges Summit was intended to light a fire to this growing, almost liberating, enthusiasm. If the tremendous response of our students is any indication, I would say that the torch was lit, it is burning brightly, and it will surely spread all over the country.
  
You may also be interested in the results of CRA’s own grand challenges conferences, http://www.cra.org/grand.challenges/, as well as CRA’s current involvement with the Computing Community Consortium, www.cra.org/ccc. About CCC:
+
I was asked to summarize the meeting in five minutes. I don't think I can do justice in such a short time to the deep and challenging conversation we experienced, with multiple threads and multiple ideas, each one more special than the other. Instead, I will simply state what I learned:
  
    What are the next big computing ideas, the ones that will define the future of computing, galvanize the very best students, and catalyze research investment and public support? The Computing Community Consortium (CCC) seeks to mobilize the computing research community to answer these questions by identifying major research opportunities for the field. The CCC will create venues for community participation in this exciting process.
+
Lesson 1. A definition of the modern engineer (engineer 2.0?), with apologies to Rick Miller:
  
[http://www.cra.org/wp/index.php?p=137 NAE Grand Challenges in Engineering], CRA, updated 25 February 2008, accessed 14 September 2009 (General)
+
I will borrow from President Vest's spectacular summary. The modern engineer is:
 +
 
 +
  * Engineer (in the traditional sense: I would say Engineer 1.0)   
 +
  * Leader
 +
  * Innovator
 +
  * Entrepreneur
 +
 
 +
Passion was also mentioned often in the meeting. What a welcome addition to the engineering attributes.
 +
 
 +
Lesson 2. The new canvas on which engineers now paint:
 +
 
 +
I will characterize it as
 +
 
 +
Engineering + {subject}
 +
 
 +
This evolution is manifested steadily, most spectacularly in health: engineering+health; engineering+biology. And earlier today: engineering+law. It is an essential part of the NAE Grand Challenges.
 +
 
 +
Indeed, Engineering +, as in enabling other disciplines, is now the norm.
 +
 
 +
And if I may make a side note, it is in this very context that one should see the letter "E" in STEM K-12 education (namely, engineering as enabling, encompassing and integrating, rather than as another vertical silo, as is math and science).
 +
 
 +
Can Engineering +, as envisioned by the NAE Grand Challenges, help us get out of our deep financial crisis? Is it too much of a stretch that one can map almost one-to-one the federal stimulus initiatives to the NAE Grand Challenge Themes of: urban infrastructure, IT+health, green technologies, K-12 education? Perhaps it is a distant echo, but an echo nonetheless, and a hopeful one at that.
 +
 
 +
Lesson 3. The importance of policy-making and public awareness in advancing the solution to the challenges:
 +
 
 +
Sustainability, Health, Vulnerability; even the Joy of Living depend greatly on government policies, regulations, and federal funding priorities. These can dramatically alter the progress to the solution of the Grand Challenges. Informing and interacting with the politicians and the public and educating the citizenry are paramount for this task.
 +
 
 +
This is the theme of engineering + social science: one that deals with human nature, brings about constantly changing complex systems, and makes life interesting -- and one in which we have been the least successful. The current global crisis underscores its vast importance. We must face it in earnest. We must become policy brokers.
 +
 
 +
Lesson 4. The need for a new engineering education paradigm.
 +
 
 +
The enabling role of engineering in transforming society is the principle behind the proposal for the new educational model, presented earlier, the Grand Challenges Scholars program that will prepare engineers to become world changers. You saw first-hand some of them already here, even if they don't know it yet.
 +
 
 +
This combined curricular and extra-curricular program will embody Engineering +. It is envisioned to also serve as a pilot of innovative educational approaches that may eventually become the mainstream educational paradigm for all engineering students. We are ready to implement it on a pilot basis at Duke, Olin and USC.
 +
 
 +
What is next?
 +
 
 +
First, we solicit your comments and ideas. On-line communication will be established and continue. We will also prepare a formal assessment of the meeting and of next steps, with the help of Dr. Ragusa, Research Professor of Education at USC.
 +
 
 +
I think that we all see the NAE Grand Challenges as a big-picture road map for education and research. Surely, there are other important technological challenges that are closely related- but I think the big tent described by Professor Socolow has plenty of room for them all.
 +
 
 +
In a sense, this Summit was a conversation on what is "hot" in the big picture of "engineering the solution of key societal problems" at the beginning of the 21st century. It also introduced a somewhat different form of a meeting, one more closely resembling a TED conference -- where participants are exposed to a kaleidoscope of ideas beyond their own narrow subject area. And it produced a concrete proposal for tinkering with our undergraduate engineering education.
 +
 
 +
We believe that these elements are worth repeating in the near future, perhaps one or two years from now, perhaps with the support of the federal agencies (hint, hint). Potentially, they should be enhanced with new ones, such as:
 +
 
 +
    * Internationalization: Ensuring that solutions have global applications.
 +
    * Other forms of engineering +, notably for solving other important societal and global problems
 +
      (e.g. poverty, world conflict comes to mind).
 +
    * Engagement with policy makers, social scientists, and the media (particularly, new media).
 +
 
 +
The Davos Economic Summit is attended by hordes of media. We would like to make this event the Davos of Engineering. We can even produce snow, as we showed yesterday!
 +
 
 +
Bringing the awareness agenda to the forefront of mainstream attention will not be easy -- but it will be a necessary battle worth winning.
 +
 
 +
[http://www.ddj.com/hpc-high-performance-computing/215800436;jsessionid=GJ3WSXERTJWUNQE1GHPSKH4ATMY32JVN?_requestid=155351 Wrapping Up the NAE Grand Challenges Summit], techweb, updated 25 February 2008, accessed 4 March 2009 (General)

Latest revision as of 08:11, 14 September 2009

March 04, 2009 Wrapping Up the NAE Grand Challenges Summit Engineering Dean's closing remarks summarize the conference

The National Academy of Engineering Grand Challenge Summit, a two-day event recently held at Duke University, brought together more than 900 leading engineering, science, humanities and social science scholars to articulate the challenges and opportunities of the science, technology, and policy related to each Grand Challenge and proposed solutions. The Grand Challenges are a call to action and serve as a focal point for society's attention to the most important opportunities that challenge our quality of life.

The summit's speakers featured an array of national engineering leaders and thinkers, including:

  * Charles Vest, NAE president
  * Robert Socolow, Princeton University
  * Robert Langer, MIT, recipient of the 2008 Millennium Technology Prize
  * Tom Byers, Stanford University?
  * Donald MacLean Kerr, principal deputy director, U.S. National Intelligence
  * Jeff Hawkins, founder, Redwood Center for Theoretical Neuroscience 

Closing remarks which summed up the event were delivered by Yannis C. Yortsos, Dean of Engineering at the University of Southern California.

At a rather unsuspecting time, a mere one year ago, the National Academy of Engineering articulated 14 engineering grand challenges. While financial clouds were still far in the horizon, these challenges were centered on important societal and human needs. Professor Socolow brilliantly categorized them yesterday:

Sustainability, Health, Vulnerability, The Joy of Living

When the clouds brought the global financial storm last Fall, these needs moved from a perhaps abstract subtext to the center of gravity of today's reality, one very real to everyone, everywhere.

Engineering schools across the country warmly embraced the NAE grand challenges. This first Grand Challenges Summit was intended to light a fire to this growing, almost liberating, enthusiasm. If the tremendous response of our students is any indication, I would say that the torch was lit, it is burning brightly, and it will surely spread all over the country.

I was asked to summarize the meeting in five minutes. I don't think I can do justice in such a short time to the deep and challenging conversation we experienced, with multiple threads and multiple ideas, each one more special than the other. Instead, I will simply state what I learned:

Lesson 1. A definition of the modern engineer (engineer 2.0?), with apologies to Rick Miller:

I will borrow from President Vest's spectacular summary. The modern engineer is:

  * Engineer (in the traditional sense: I would say Engineer 1.0)    
  * Leader
  * Innovator
  * Entrepreneur 

Passion was also mentioned often in the meeting. What a welcome addition to the engineering attributes.

Lesson 2. The new canvas on which engineers now paint:

I will characterize it as

Engineering + {subject}

This evolution is manifested steadily, most spectacularly in health: engineering+health; engineering+biology. And earlier today: engineering+law. It is an essential part of the NAE Grand Challenges.

Indeed, Engineering +, as in enabling other disciplines, is now the norm.

And if I may make a side note, it is in this very context that one should see the letter "E" in STEM K-12 education (namely, engineering as enabling, encompassing and integrating, rather than as another vertical silo, as is math and science).

Can Engineering +, as envisioned by the NAE Grand Challenges, help us get out of our deep financial crisis? Is it too much of a stretch that one can map almost one-to-one the federal stimulus initiatives to the NAE Grand Challenge Themes of: urban infrastructure, IT+health, green technologies, K-12 education? Perhaps it is a distant echo, but an echo nonetheless, and a hopeful one at that.

Lesson 3. The importance of policy-making and public awareness in advancing the solution to the challenges:

Sustainability, Health, Vulnerability; even the Joy of Living depend greatly on government policies, regulations, and federal funding priorities. These can dramatically alter the progress to the solution of the Grand Challenges. Informing and interacting with the politicians and the public and educating the citizenry are paramount for this task.

This is the theme of engineering + social science: one that deals with human nature, brings about constantly changing complex systems, and makes life interesting -- and one in which we have been the least successful. The current global crisis underscores its vast importance. We must face it in earnest. We must become policy brokers.

Lesson 4. The need for a new engineering education paradigm.

The enabling role of engineering in transforming society is the principle behind the proposal for the new educational model, presented earlier, the Grand Challenges Scholars program that will prepare engineers to become world changers. You saw first-hand some of them already here, even if they don't know it yet.

This combined curricular and extra-curricular program will embody Engineering +. It is envisioned to also serve as a pilot of innovative educational approaches that may eventually become the mainstream educational paradigm for all engineering students. We are ready to implement it on a pilot basis at Duke, Olin and USC.

What is next?

First, we solicit your comments and ideas. On-line communication will be established and continue. We will also prepare a formal assessment of the meeting and of next steps, with the help of Dr. Ragusa, Research Professor of Education at USC.

I think that we all see the NAE Grand Challenges as a big-picture road map for education and research. Surely, there are other important technological challenges that are closely related- but I think the big tent described by Professor Socolow has plenty of room for them all.

In a sense, this Summit was a conversation on what is "hot" in the big picture of "engineering the solution of key societal problems" at the beginning of the 21st century. It also introduced a somewhat different form of a meeting, one more closely resembling a TED conference -- where participants are exposed to a kaleidoscope of ideas beyond their own narrow subject area. And it produced a concrete proposal for tinkering with our undergraduate engineering education.

We believe that these elements are worth repeating in the near future, perhaps one or two years from now, perhaps with the support of the federal agencies (hint, hint). Potentially, they should be enhanced with new ones, such as:

    * Internationalization: Ensuring that solutions have global applications.
    * Other forms of engineering +, notably for solving other important societal and global problems 
      (e.g. poverty, world conflict comes to mind).
    * Engagement with policy makers, social scientists, and the media (particularly, new media). 

The Davos Economic Summit is attended by hordes of media. We would like to make this event the Davos of Engineering. We can even produce snow, as we showed yesterday!

Bringing the awareness agenda to the forefront of mainstream attention will not be easy -- but it will be a necessary battle worth winning.

Wrapping Up the NAE Grand Challenges Summit, techweb, updated 25 February 2008, accessed 4 March 2009 (General)